Barefoot and Pregnant…

For those unfamiliar with the subject line for this blog it is an expression common in the southern states here in the good ‘ol U. S. of A. It is meant to convey a certain type of position in which certain mindsets believe women should find themselves. It is meant to convey that a woman’s place is… in the home. Having and rearing children.

Not very 2010, is it? (hell…. it’s never been particularly progressive, eh?)

But this expression popped into my head when I last visited Cox Arboretum and found myself surrounded almost exclusively by women brandishing cameras. Seriously…. there were three of us males and easily twenty-five or more women with cameras in hand, snapping away merrily at all sorts of things. And it got me to thinking “When did this happen?”

See….. growing up in the 60’s and 70’s I saw that snapping pictures was clearly the domain of men. Fathers took pictures of the family. Men took pictures for advertising. Men took pictures for publications. Were there women who snapped pics? Of course, but they were, by and large, far and few between. But this is clearly no longer the case. ‘Bout time too. So I pondered why it is that women can be found behind so many cameras these days. For my thinking there are two primary reasons: the Women’s Movement (primarily of the 70’s) and the introduction of the digital camera.

Clearly the Women’s Movement did much to empower women to believe (and subsequently to act) they could do and be anything that men were. It unshackled them from the position of home-maker and child-rearer and brought them forward to being a true partner in marriage and business. Is there still room for improvement? Of course. But most certainly things have changed dramatically over the past 40-years. Today, being a June Cleaver is a choice and not an expectation (except in certain households which maintain a certain religious viewpoint of the position of women in the household).

But what of digital photography?

Now please do not think this sexist, but I firmly believe that women of 30, 40 and more years ago would have eschewed film-based, 35mm SLR photography as being too “complicated” for them. It was the doman of men because it was “technical” and that wasn’t the arena for women. Of course, this sort of thinking was firmly established in their collective mindset because our culture had created distinctly separate roles for men and women and matters “technical” were the doman of men. It wasn’t correct, but it is what we had.

So mix in the Women’s Movement and we still didn’t see an explosive growth in women behind the camera. For whatever reason it appeared to remain the domain of men by and large. But along came digital and more importantly inexpensive digital. I’m thinking the tiny point-n-shoots and more recently the entry-level dSLRs (like the Rebel series from Canon or the D3000 and D5000 from Nikon). And regardless of the fact there were available so many fully automatic film-based cameras it just seemed that women didn’t make the leap to being behind the camera until digital became commonplace.

Maybe it is because folks assume (erroneously) that digital is “easier” than film when both cameras are set to full automatic? I don’t know. But I can’t help but think there is a very direct connection between the introduction of reasonably priced digital cameras and the proliferation of women behind the camera. For whatever reason, in the collective mind-set of women, digital is a form of photography that could be embraced, while film was something left to others.

A quick review of my Blog Roll here on WordPress reveals that eight of the eleven blogs I follow, which are completely or mostly photography related, belong to women. I think that’s awesome. A clear indication that things are markedly different today than when I grew up.

So… am I missing something? Am I completely off-base? Have I lost my mind for even bringing up such a subject? I’d love to hear from the women out there.


6 thoughts on “Barefoot and Pregnant…

  1. “A quick review of my Blog Roll here on WordPress reveals that eight of the eleven blogs I follow, which are completely or mostly photography related, belong to women.”

    That’s cos you’re a smarmy womaniser and forever trying to chat ’em up. Heh heh


  2. That you’re a smarmy womaniser and forever trying to chat ’em up… but trying to hide it.

    Or that you’re a smarmy gay and forever trying to chat ’em up.


  3. I’m a man, but there are also more women in both my art courses, photo II and drawing the model sustained study. In bothe courses I am one of two men out of maybe about a total of 12 people. I have thought about this much. I am not complaining though

  4. I think to a certain extent digital has made photography more approachable for women. But mostly because men held the domain in film photography for so long – I think a lot of women (including a much younger me) were put off by men making it seem harder than it possibly needed to be.

    So we mostly decided that it wasnt worth arguing over and did other things. Or fumbled our way through regardless πŸ™‚

    A digital DSLR is no more or less difficult to use than a film camera, I truly think the KEY thing that has made digital photography so approachable is the lack of film developing cost and *most of all* the instant gratification you get from being able to see your image either on the screen of the camera, or later that day on your computer.

    Tie that in with the advent of Interwebs and dreaded social media things like FacePalm and twitter and being able to take a pic, view it and share it with the world in a matter of hours or minutes, that becomes vastly appealing, as women tend to be more in the mindset of sharing these things with friends/family etc.

    Not to say that men dont do this, just perhaps in a different way (I think a lot of posts on many of the forums I see are some form of secret man competition – my image is bigger, closer, sharper than yours, my lens got me a better shot, my gear is flasher etc, see how cool my shots are as a result) – which I just ignore really πŸ™‚

    So there you go, a womanly POV, as requested.

  5. Well thank you lensaddiction for putting in some thoughts regarding the issue. And I will have to consider your thoughts regarding manly competition versus a desire to share in this battle of the sexes in photography.

    I don’t know what it says about me though as I regularly share images via Twitter and Facebook from my cell phone camera.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s